MethodsReader 07371 · Member profile
Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer addresses “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record ...
Case 21 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether as...
Case 29 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcome...
Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...
Case 22 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Lin...
Case 14 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, u...
Case 30 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...
Case 20 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source refere...
Case 23 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...
Case 7 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducible...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 32 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative fi...