StudyDesign 07356 · Member profile

Case 20 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the ...

Case 12 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Disc...

Case 27 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the la...

Case 18 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and d...

Case 21 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginnin...

Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the answer addresses “Create separate columns for the quant...

Case 4 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer address...

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

Case 30 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reference management: dist...

Case 41 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Assay-specific reference range...

Case 1 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformati...

Case 16 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation....