StudyDesign 07256 · Member profile
Case 13 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Lin...
Case 18 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...
Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...
Case 7 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link the...
A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer different questions. Record the report’s own definition and units before comparing ...
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...
Case 13 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...
Case 3 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answ...
Case 7 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all presp...
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...
Case 30 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Case 16 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measur...