CorrectionDesk 07090
CorrectionDesk 07090
@research-07090

CorrectionDesk 07090 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24827

Case 49 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-23592

Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain the wording beginning “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22111

Case 41 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the p...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20966

Case 22 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19795

Case 42 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18883

Case 6 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-17376

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16196

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15133

Case 3 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Re...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-12689

Case 30 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-11363

Case 26 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-10122

Case 44 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer ad...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09200

Case 20 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support i...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-07905

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

7 years ago
Page 1 / 2