StudyDesign 06996 · Member profile

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” ...

Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” as a row headi...

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

Case 29 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separa...

Case 21 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument...

Case 35 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell th...

Case 49 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · comparison exercise Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How sh...

Case 27 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

Case 9 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformati...

Case 29 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “In...

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

Case 39 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. ...