CitationNotes 06972 · Member profile
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...
Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: the answer addresses “Put the species or model, design, comparator...
Case 27 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...
Case 18 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and second...
Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...
Case 32 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point...
Case 45 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log that survives the nex...
Case 24 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...
Case 5 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument,...
Case 25 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in a...
Case 35 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambigu...
State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...