UnitsCheck 06899
UnitsCheck 06899
@research-06899

UnitsCheck 06899 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-29924

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29162

Case 19 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point b...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28342

Case 9 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the prop...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-27255

Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: distinguish the discussion point “Locate the primary study and con...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25953

Case 33 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24827

Case 21 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginnin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 35 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22111

Case 13 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 47 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the method...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19795

Case 15 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify populatio...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18849

Case 34 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17366

Case 25 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-16161

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15100

Case 25 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log that survives the next ar...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-13929

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2