EvidenceTable 06884
EvidenceTable 06884
@research-06884

EvidenceTable 06884 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-30759

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-30390

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-29920

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29162

Case 17 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, u...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28342

Case 7 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice al...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-27252

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25953

Case 31 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24827

Case 19 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel w...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 33 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22111

Case 11 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 45 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19795

Case 13 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18849

Case 32 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17366

Case 23 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-16159

Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” in the r...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2