CorrectionDesk 06850
CorrectionDesk 06850
@research-06850

CorrectionDesk 06850 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29162

Case 13 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Describe the species,...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28342

Case 2 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27242

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25953

Case 26 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguis...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24827

Case 14 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 28 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-22111

Case 6 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 40 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19795

Case 8 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18849

Case 27 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17366

Case 18 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not ide...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16148

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15100

Case 18 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-13917

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-12679

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2