ArchiveReader 06745
ArchiveReader 06745
@research-06745

ArchiveReader 06745 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-30375

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” i...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-29903

Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29162

Case 2 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-28319

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-27214

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them…” ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25953

Case 12 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 13 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat expl...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 25 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19794

Case 23 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording begi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18849

Case 12 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17366

Case 3 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 44 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15100

Case 3 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2