UnitsCheck 06739
UnitsCheck 06739
@research-06739

UnitsCheck 06739 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-29903

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-29162

Case 1 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed a...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-28318

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-27214

Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrie...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25953

Case 11 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-24822

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 12 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beg...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-22096

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 25 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19794

Case 22 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18849

Case 11 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17366

Case 2 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary so...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 43 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15100

Case 2 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a re...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-13893

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2