CorrectionDesk 06690
CorrectionDesk 06690
@research-06690

CorrectionDesk 06690 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-30369

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-29900

Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: distinguish the discussion point “State whether it was prespecified and how…...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-29154

Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” as a row heading in a proposed...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-28307

Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Keep this as research documentation and d...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-27202

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25953

Case 4 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-24813

Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 5 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point be...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-22085

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 18 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19794

Case 15 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addres...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18849

Case 4 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-17358

Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the answer addresses “State the study design and what was actually m...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 36 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-15089

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” is an excerpt fr...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2