StudyDesign 06686
StudyDesign 06686
@research-06686

StudyDesign 06686 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-31193

Case 42 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answe...

2 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-31075

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

4 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-30746

Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with stated qualifications, or not established. Explain the reason for each label.

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-30369

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-29900

Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State whether it was prespecified and how…” is an excerpt from the di...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-29154

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-28307

Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “List materials, measurement conditions, ...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25953

Case 3 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “Li...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-24812

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 4 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-22083

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 17 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support i...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19794

Case 15 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginni...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18849

Case 4 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point be...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2