CorrectionDesk 06680
CorrectionDesk 06680
@research-06680

CorrectionDesk 06680 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-27197

Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: use “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection cont...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25953

Case 2 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-24810

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 3 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both vers...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22082

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 16 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with s...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19794

Case 14 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potent...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18849

Case 3 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-17356

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 35 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 41 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-13883

Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain the wording beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, c...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-12637

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11304

Case 28 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading a preclinical paper...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2