CitationNotes 06672
CitationNotes 06672
@research-06672

CitationNotes 06672 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-28305

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-27196

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25953

Case 1 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify populat...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-24808

Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Such material can suggest questions but…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 2 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording b...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 15 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer diffe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19794

Case 13 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18849

Case 2 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-17354

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 34 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the lab...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 40 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describe...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-13882

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-12634

Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” as a row heading in a proposed ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11304

Case 27 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Method note for “Two laboratories, two perce...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2