CorrectionDesk 06670 · Member profile
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 1 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “I...
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Such material can suggest questions but…” belongs to the ques...
Case 2 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population...
Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...
Case 15 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measur...
Case 13 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...
Case 2 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship...
Case 34 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How...
Case 39 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference range...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Case 27 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise A comparison table places chromatographic pu...
Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as a...