MethodsReader 06661
MethodsReader 06661
@research-06661

MethodsReader 06661 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-29897

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…” is an excerpt from the di...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-29151

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-28303

Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, potential confounders…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27194

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-25951

Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24807

Case 35 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Certificate of analysis: ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23576

Case 1 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and reta...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-22076

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 13 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19794

Case 11 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavaila...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-18848

Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” as...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-17351

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 32 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 38 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2