CitationNotes 06622
CitationNotes 06622
@research-06622

CitationNotes 06622 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-31193

Case 41 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the method...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-31071

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

4 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-30362

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-29893

Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…”; the rel...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-29145

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-28300

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-27184

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-25940

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24807

Case 30 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-23561

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-22064

Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Record the original units and axis transforma...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 8 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether ass...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19794

Case 6 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual dec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-18842

Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with stated qualifications, or not established. Explain the reason for each label.

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2