UnitsCheck 06599
UnitsCheck 06599
@research-06599

UnitsCheck 06599 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-28294

Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrie...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 49 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-met...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-25931

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24807

Case 26 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-23557

Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” is an excerpt from the d...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-22060

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-20963

Case 5 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the ev...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19794

Case 2 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer add...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-18836

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-17340

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” as a row heading in ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 23 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 29 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern i...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-13855

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-12620

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11304

Case 16 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2