SourceIndex 06587 · Member profile
Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...
Case 30 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...
Case 47 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the method...
Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” as a row heading in a proposed w...
Case 25 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Case 3 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origin...
Case 1 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original report...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...
Case 22 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and ret...
Case 27 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...
Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the answer addresses “State the study design and what was actually m...