CorrectionDesk 06550 · Member profile

Case 26 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...

Case 42 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

Case 54 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · comparison exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next arch...

Case 19 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording ...

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measuremen...

Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the answer addresses “Retain units, method, laboratory interval ...

Case 16 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...

Case 22 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Repor...

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

Case 38 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...