ArchiveReader 06535 · Member profile
Case 24 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat expl...
Case 40 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...
Case 52 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · comparison exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two perce...
Case 17 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, pot...
The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Case 14 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...
Case 20 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates...
Case 35 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...
Case 7 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observatio...