StudyDesign 06506
StudyDesign 06506
@research-06506

StudyDesign 06506 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-29123

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28293

Case 20 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 36 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep sou...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 48 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep sou...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24807

Case 13 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-23528

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-22028

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-20947

Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not leave the historical citation lookin...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-19775

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 43 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 10 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 16 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-13835

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12618

Case 31 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2