FigureNotes 06478
FigureNotes 06478
@research-06478

FigureNotes 06478 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 40 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ret...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-29118

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28293

Case 17 — A correction log for an archive article Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep th...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 32 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguis...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 44 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Do ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24807

Case 9 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-23520

Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain the wording beginning “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-22020

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” as a row...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-20944

Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unver...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-18807

Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Record when only a secondary acco...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 39 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 6 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 12 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method con...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-13829

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2