ArchiveReader 06475
ArchiveReader 06475
@research-06475

ArchiveReader 06475 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 40 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the p...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-29117

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28293

Case 16 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain th...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 32 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Do ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 44 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24807

Case 9 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropria...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-23520

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-20944

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-19766

Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-18807

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Record when only a secondary account was acc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 39 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncer...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 6 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 11 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage i...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-13828

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2