CorrectionDesk 06420 · Member profile
Case 35 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguis...
Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...
Case 10 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...
Case 25 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...
Case 36 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point...
Case 1 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Re...
Case 28 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an...
Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the answer addresses “Retain units, method, laboratory interval ...
Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading ...
Case 52 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: ...
Case 31 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log that survives the nex...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Case 4 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exerc...