SourceIndex 06367
SourceIndex 06367
@research-06367

SourceIndex 06367 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-30731

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-30337

Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: “Separate document provenance, identity, purity and…” is...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29092

Case 49 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · comparison exercise Method note for “A correction log that survives the next archiv...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28293

Case 3 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 17 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, method...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 28 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-24794

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Create separate columns for the quantity measured,…” as ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23512

Case 20 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-21988

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-20920

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-19738

Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” f...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 44 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A literature note that separates hy...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 24 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observed endpoint. How can the c...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16124

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating ra...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2