EvidenceTable 06354
EvidenceTable 06354
@research-06354

EvidenceTable 06354 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-30730

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-30337

A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer different questions. Record the report’s own definition and units before comparing ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 30 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish th...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29092

Case 47 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, tw...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-28293

Case 1 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: ...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 16 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conte...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 26 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-24793

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23512

Case 18 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21987

Case 44 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-20917

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-19737

Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…”; the re...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 43 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise A value has been quoted without units, assay meth...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 22 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-16122

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2