EvidenceTable 06344
EvidenceTable 06344
@research-06344

EvidenceTable 06344 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-30729

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-30336

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 30 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beg...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29092

Case 46 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysi...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-28291

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 14 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Exp...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 25 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “In...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-24789

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23512

Case 17 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the ori...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21987

Case 42 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20916

Case 43 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A literature note that separates hy...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-19736

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 41 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading a preclinical paper: w...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 20 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-16117

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2