CitationNotes 06342
CitationNotes 06342
@research-06342

CitationNotes 06342 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-31056

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

4 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-30729

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-30336

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 30 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29092

Case 46 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-28290

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 14 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 25 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-24788

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23512

Case 17 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and ret...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21987

Case 42 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the lab...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20916

Case 43 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-19735

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 41 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Method note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 20 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all pres...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2