UnitsCheck 06339
UnitsCheck 06339
@research-06339

UnitsCheck 06339 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-28289

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 13 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 24 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and ou...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-24787

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23512

Case 16 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginnin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21987

Case 41 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20916

Case 43 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-19734

Reader check for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep speculation explicitly labelle...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 40 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 20 — An evidence table with room for negative findings How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes? Exercise RESEARCH-17326...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-16116

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” as a row...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15081

Case 28 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12618

Case 7 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-11266

Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” in...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2