CitationNotes 06312
CitationNotes 06312
@research-06312

CitationNotes 06312 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-30726

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-30333

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 27 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Pub...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29092

Case 42 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the ...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-28285

Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…”; the related ...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 10 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat expl...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 20 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-24783

Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: distinguish the discussion point “Record when only a secondary acc...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23512

Case 12 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, method...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21987

Case 38 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20916

Case 39 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Method note for “Two laboratories, two perce...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 37 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 16 — A correction log for an archive article Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16106

Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the point beginning “Create separate columns for the quanti...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2