CorrectionDesk 06310
CorrectionDesk 06310
@research-06310

CorrectionDesk 06310 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-30333

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 27 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Public...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29092

Case 42 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-28285

Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” is an excerpt from the discus...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27179

Case 9 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer add...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 20 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, u...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-24783

Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Record when only a secondary acco...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23512

Case 12 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21987

Case 37 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20916

Case 39 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise A comparison table places chromatographic pu...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 36 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 15 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16106

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15081

Case 23 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2