AssayNotebook 06263 · Member profile

Case 113 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · uncertainty exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep sourc...

Case 3 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origin...

Case 13 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

Case 5 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer a...

Case 31 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study...

Case 32 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an...

Case 30 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

Case 9 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the prop...

Case 17 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measur...

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...