CorrectionDesk 06240 · Member profile
Case 111 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · uncertainty exercise A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How s...
Case 10 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the ...
Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...
Case 2 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all pr...
Case 27 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference range...
Case 29 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...
Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” as a row heading in a pro...
Case 26 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...
Case 5 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed a...
Case 13 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...
Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…...
Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...