MethodsReader 06221 · Member profile
Case 34 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...
Case 108 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · uncertainty exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative finding...
Correction note for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: retain the wording beginning “Put the species or model, design, ...
Case 7 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a ...
Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...
Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...
Case 25 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise m...
Case 26 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...
Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...
Case 24 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationshi...
Case 3 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-referen...
Case 51 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysis: w...
Case 11 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that...
The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.