CorrectionDesk 06210
CorrectionDesk 06210
@research-06210

CorrectionDesk 06210 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29888

Case 20 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model ...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29092

Case 33 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 107 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · uncertainty exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27170

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 6 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source referen...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-24759

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21987

Case 23 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer diffe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20916

Case 24 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 22 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the ori...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 1 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and out...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16079

Case 49 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distinguis...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15081

Case 9 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all pr...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-13756

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2