CorrectionDesk 06200
CorrectionDesk 06200
@research-06200

CorrectionDesk 06200 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 106 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · uncertainty exercise Method note for “Reference management: distinguish p...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-27168

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25919

Case 4 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed a...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-24756

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21987

Case 22 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fields. How can an archi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20916

Case 23 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-19704

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18803

Case 21 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful discussion acknowledge? Exe...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-17324

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16079

Case 48 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep sou...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15081

Case 8 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-13752

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-12597

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-11235

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2