StudyDesign 06156 · Member profile
Case 37 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Assay-specific reference range...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Case 42 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the ...
Case 15 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and ou...
Case 27 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...
Case 100 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · uncertainty exercise Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”...
Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Case 33 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ran...
Case 15 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...
Case 17 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...
Case 54 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an a...
Case 14 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...