EvidenceTable 06144
EvidenceTable 06144
@research-06144

EvidenceTable 06144 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-13737

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-10041

Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: distinguish the discussion point “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond th...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-06313

Case 2 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method cond...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-04872

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-03322

Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…”; the r...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-01914

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-00635

Case 37 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distin...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2