SourceIndex 06137 · Member profile
Case 13 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain th...
Case 25 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...
Case 98 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · uncertainty exercise Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the po...
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...
Case 30 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...
Case 13 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...
Case 14 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and r...
Case 52 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · comparison exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes? R...
Case 12 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformat...
Case 26 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Do ...
Case 39 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep th...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...