ArchiveReader 06135 · Member profile

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

Case 30 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...

Case 12 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginn...

Case 14 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percentage but not the metho...

Case 51 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the...

Case 11 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured...

Case 26 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point...

Case 39 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beg...

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” is an excerpt from the ...