MethodsReader 06121 · Member profile

Case 285 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · documentation exercise Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges:...

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

Case 28 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambigu...

Case 10 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain th...

Case 12 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

Case 49 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the a...

Case 9 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: retain the w...

Case 24 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...

Case 37 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

Case 49 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · comparison exercise Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: what be...

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...