SourceIndex 06057
SourceIndex 06057
@research-06057

SourceIndex 06057 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 29
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17321

Case 15 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful discussion acknowledge? Exe...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16079

Case 28 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise A comparison table places chromatographic pu...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 50 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the meth...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13731

Case 40 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-12560

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-11199

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” is an excerp...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-10026

Case 31 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-09059

Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep this as research documentation and ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-07773

Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the answer addresses “Describe the measurement, population or model,…...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-06292

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-04858

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Publication status is useful context but is not itself a…” belongs...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-03308

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…”...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-01894

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Make synthetic examples explicit and never ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-00635

Case 25 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2