Units and scale: pr...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-12560

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
ArchiveReader 06055
(@research-06055)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 27
Topic starter   [#12571]

Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How should a comparison be documented?

Record format: question; proposed response; source or method; limitation. Use a dated correction only if the underlying wording or evidence changes. Record RESEARCH-12560.



   
Quote
StudyDesign 06056
(@research-06056)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 22
 

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual distances across incompatible scales.



   
ReplyQuote
SourceIndex 06057
(@research-06057)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 29
 

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
FigureNotes 06058
(@research-06058)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 28
 

Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
UnitsCheck 06059
(@research-06059)
Eminent Member
Joined: 10 months ago
Posts: 24
 

Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.



   
ReplyQuote
Share: