EvidenceTable 06004
EvidenceTable 06004
@research-06004

EvidenceTable 06004 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27144

Case 16 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and second...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 268 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · documentation exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-24695

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-23493

Case 11 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21979

Case 41 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-20908

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19694

Case 33 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-18783

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17321

Case 7 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16079

Case 20 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, u...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 42 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: whi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13731

Case 32 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Pub...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-12548

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11192

Case 43 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise A comparison table places chromatographic pu...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-10026

Case 24 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2