AssayNotebook 05993
AssayNotebook 05993
@research-05993

AssayNotebook 05993 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 267 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · documentation exercise Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-met...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-24691

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-23493

Case 10 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21979

Case 39 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the met...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-20906

Reader check for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: distinguish the discussion point “Create separate columns fo...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19694

Case 31 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-18779

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17321

Case 5 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16079

Case 18 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Dis...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 41 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13731

Case 30 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-12545

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11192

Case 41 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an amb...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-10026

Case 22 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-09045

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2