StudyDesign 05986
StudyDesign 05986
@research-05986

StudyDesign 05986 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29092

Case 10 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the ...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 80 — A correction log for an archive article · documentation exercise Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point begi...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27144

Case 14 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 266 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · documentation exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Public...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-24691

Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: distinguish the discussion point “Link the publisher notice beside the citati...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-23493

Case 9 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21979

Case 38 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparis...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-20906

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19694

Case 30 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concer...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17321

Case 4 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16079

Case 17 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 40 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “In...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13731

Case 29 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: dist...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-12543

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2