EvidenceTable 05894 · Member profile

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...

Case 68 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · comparison exercise Correction note for “Certificate of analysis: whic...

Case 1 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expa...

Case 253 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the rea...

Case 39 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell...

Case 25 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concer...

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

Case 17 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

Case 4 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving t...

Case 27 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point...