CorrectionDesk 05890
CorrectionDesk 05890
@research-05890

CorrectionDesk 05890 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-29875

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-29090

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 68 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · comparison exercise A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percen...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27144

Case 1 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fields. How can an archiv...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 252 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · comparison exercise Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the la...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24679

Case 38 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the la...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21979

Case 24 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-20884

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19694

Case 16 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-18750

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-17304

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16079

Case 4 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and de...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 26 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the met...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13731

Case 16 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original repor...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2